I had the pleasure of seeing former Santa Clara County poet laureate Nils Peterson at the Willow Glen library in December 2016. In case you were wondering why I’m only now posting it is because I’ve had this sitting in my “to post” folder for ages!
What I enjoyed about his overall style, compared to other poetry readings I’ve been to, is that he repeated himself. He would recite a poem or thought, and repeat it, in case we didn’t hear him in the first time. After he would do that, he would take it one step further and make comments on it, as though it were a dialogue between speaker and attendee. It helped the audience comprehend what he was saying. To me, that was a fun and engaging way to present the material, rather than intoning on it like the work was sacred. He made the poetry accessible in this way.
I think that approach came from his many years of
Upon further reflection, I believe that the way he spoke may be a learned approach to presenting a poem. You almost need to break it down and analyze the poem as soon as it is chewed, rather than waiting for it to digest.
The words are on the page with fiction or nonfiction work. The author isn’t allowed to leave things out for fear of losing the reader’s trust. The poet has some leeway within the form to present instant gratification or to engage the reader to slow down and stop to think about what the poet is saying. I felt that it worked perfectly for him.
It was such an interesting approach to the public presentation of the work for me because I’m a complete dolt when I get in front of a crowd. It felt collaborative. Most readings I go to seem to go out of their way to separate the speaker from the audience with an invisible wall, whether the speaker is aware of it or not. I suppose it’s implied. But the idea that
My only concern is that it all sort of ran together. I couldn’t tell when one poem started and ended. I mean, it’s not like a poet always names their poems, sometimes the poem exists and for the sake of order, the title is the first line of the poem.
He would start but not officially introduce the poem. He would say something like, “this next one will make you think of Christmas,” or whatever point he was trying to make. He would read it, and it would evoke an emotion or feel from the audience, then he would go on to discuss it in his collaborative way. I’m not the greatest poet, but as a speaker, I would clearly delineate between pieces in order to give my audience the chance to breathe. It goes back to comprehension by the audience. I believe that sets the tone between chewing and digesting.
One thing I enjoyed is that he didn’t read his own work. He chose a theme (nostalgia for winter and Christmas holidays) and went with that. He read one or two of his wintery poems from his years of writing himself, but then went on to share Robert Frost and also read an excerpt from Garrison Keillor’s work. I think most speakers are under intense pressure to promote their latest project, but Nils didn’t do that.
That was refreshing to experience. You’re not being sold something by the speaker, you’re asked to share in an experience he has crafted using poetry and the platform of public reading. There are tons of ways to do that with poetry, millions of poems exist with certain themes that can be interpreted any which way the speaker wants it to. Fiction and nonfiction do not have the ability to do that. That was fascinating to think about.
The most engaging part of the evening is when Nils introduced a few people from his choir to come down and sing for us.
He ended the reading by performing “A Child’s Christmas in Wales” by Dylan Thomas. He incorporated a few other readers to read it along with him. I’d never read it before, but I did some research after the reading, and Thomas wrote the piece for radio. I think that’s what Nils and his team
I learned a lot by attending this reading, especially in comparison to the fiction and nonfiction readings I’m to, as well as other poetry readings. There is something about the form of poetry that lends itself to performance and audience engagement. We have that ability, I suppose, within the fiction and nonfiction sphere, but I feel like it’s different with poetry. Nils did a wonderful job